Phoenix Players Theatre Group. "Horizons of (Un)Freedom: Reflections on Critical Hope from Behind the Wall." PUBLIC: Arts, Design, Humanities 5, no. 2 (2018). http://public.imaginingamerica.org/blog/article/horizons-of-unfreedom-reflections-on-critical-hope-from-behind-the-wall/.
Horizons of (Un)Freedom: Reflections on Critical Hope from Behind the Wall

Abstract

This group reflection by the Phoenix Players Theatre Group focuses on the power of making theatre in prison in relation to issues of futurity: freedom, optimism, opportunity, hope, and their darker counterparts. Notions of the future evoke feelings of success and fulfillment, as well as more tragic effects like frustration, stagnation, and depression. The perspectives of incarcerated people navigate both the hope of the future, as well as the possibility of that hope’s falsehood. Rather than articulate any single, overarching argument—which risks flattening differences of opinion, a rhetorical mode that has, historically, de-privileged the experiences of marginalized people—this article embraces multiplicity, complexity, indecision, contradiction, and paradox. Some of these reflections take the form of interview transcriptions or, indeed, theatre scripts, as the Phoenix Players voice their thoughts and feelings living in and with mass incarceration. In addition, these dialogues are punctuated with video clips and individually authored creative interludes reprinted here from past performances.

Introduction

The Phoenix Players Theatre Group (PPTG) is a performance collective located in the Auburn Correctional Facility, a maximum-security prison in upstate New York. The group was founded by Michael Rhynes and Clifford Williamson, men incarcerated in the Auburn Correctional Facility. In the words of the group’s founders, “[PPTG] is a transformative theatre community, which utilizes theatre to reconnect incarcerated people to their full humanity.” Even though the group invites several civilian facilitators into its meetings, PPTG is run and operated by incarcerated people. Since 2009, PPTG has held small, tight-knit workshops for two hours each Friday evening, with the aim of creating a space where imprisoned writers and performers can be witnessed, and where they can initiate a process of personal, cultural, and sociopolitical transformation.

 

Figure 1: Founding PPTG members Kenneth Brown, Michael Rhynes, and Shane Hale, along with first volunteer facilitator Stephen Cole and former head of volunteer services Dave Roth, discuss the origins of the group.
Courtesy of the Phoenix Players Theatre Group.

 

At the opening and closing of each session, the group recites its motto:

We are a community of transformation
Through the power of self-discovery
We create the opportunity
To know and grow into ourselves.

To fulfill this mission, the members participate in a training process, craft theatre pieces, rehearse scenes and monologues, discuss current events, and share personal stories. Ultimately, the group devises a 90-minute performance, mostly composed of solo pieces sutured together into a kind of theatrical collage, to be presented every 18 months to 2 years before an invited public audience.

According to Rhynes, the symbol of the rising phoenix represents incarcerated persons and community reborn to their humanity. He says that “[theatre] is the conduit we use to reach the still waters of the soul” (Rhynes 2014). He selected the phoenix because it represents transformation—as opposed to rehabilitation. To Rhynes, the concept of rehabilitation entails other people having control over the lives of prisoners. In contrast, he believes that transformation is about taking control of one’s own life in one’s own hands. Rhynes feels that PPTG should be about more than the mere rehabilitation of some inmates. He writes, “PPTG is about the transcendence of our past lives” (Rhynes 2014). To explore these and other facets of the PPTG process, this group-authored paper takes the form of a performance dialogue, incorporating the creative writings and personal reflections of the incarcerated members of the prison theatre group.

The embedded video links also serve as background insights into the group’s founding and its work. Most were recorded with the original founding members in 2012, during the filming of the feature-length documentary about the group, Human Again, less than three years after the group’s origination. Members were interviewed as they prepared to present their second devised piece, Maximum Will—a presentation that interwove soliloquies from Shakespeare with reflective, autobiographical pieces written by the Phoenix Players themselves. The film introduces the incarcerated members of PPTG by using their mug shots—one of the most publicly recognizable images associated with the incarcerated. This technique was employed to contrast the stereotypical image with the reality of their full humanity.

This article focuses on the power of making theatre in PPTG in relation to issues of futurity: freedom, optimism, opportunity, hope, and their darker counterparts. Notions of the future evoke feelings of success and fulfillment, as well as more tragic effects like frustration, stagnation, and depression. The perspectives of incarcerated people navigate both the hope of the future, as well as the possibility of that hope’s falsehood. By involving multiple voices in a single text, we create a dialectical space in which these differing perspectives are placed in conversation with each other. This format emphasizes the intersubjective, communal aspects of theatre in order to create a textual “stage” for expression. Rather than articulate any single, overarching argument—which risks flattening differences of opinion, a rhetorical mode that has, historically, de-privileged the experiences of marginalized people—this article embraces multiplicity, complexity, indecision, contradiction, and paradox.

Recalling Paulo Freire, this tension therefore characterizes a praxis of “critical hope,” a future-oriented attitude that nevertheless grapples with the challenges and despairs of the present. For Freire, the elimination of hope is one of the central functions of the mechanization and bureaucratization of global capitalism (Freire 1998). The rise and saturation of carcerality today exemplifies, in violent, dramatic fashion, the destruction of hope in the neoliberal machine.1 Freire believed that it was in critical reflection and dialogical engagement that the utopian desires of hope might be realized (Freire 1970). The founders of PPTG cite Freire as an influence in their work, specifically in their use of self-reflection to seek self-liberation. The writings of theatre theorist and practitioner Augusto Boal are another inspiration for the group, in this regard. Building on Freire, Boal sought to turn participants into “spect-actors,” who would not only serve as critical witnesses to situations of oppression and injustice but would also take control in these situations actively (Boal 1993, 1995). Those who follow his notion of theatre embrace a dialectical praxis that spect-actors can carry on in their lives outside the theatre. We foreground in this article the statements of the members of PPTG that practice critical hope, in order to explore how those living in conditions of confinement struggle in the present as they look to the future. As prison theatre scholar and practitioner Michael Balfour asserts, “Theatre can redirect gazes, shift perceptions and change the display. It can debate the serious pain in the system” (2004, 74). This redirected “gaze” opens a window to critical hope for the men of PPTG, as they participate in and direct the group.

Some of these reflections take the form of interview transcriptions or, indeed, theatre scripts, as the members of PPTG voice their thoughts and feelings on the present and future living in and with mass incarceration. These dialogues respond to five formal questions posed to the group, from “What does freedom mean to you?” to “When did you most lack hope, optimism, and/or freedom?” At the time of this writing, PPTG comprised eight incarcerated members living in Auburn Correctional, all of whom participated in the exercise: Nate Powell, Demetrius “Meat” Molina, Adam Roberts, Sheldon “Superb” Johnson, Raymond Van Clief, Mark “AZ” Thompson, Jerome Walker, and Robert “Bam” Lawrence. Prisoners in Auburn Correctional live in individual cells, as opposed to dormitory-living or sharing a cell with a bunkmate, and because of this separation between members, crafting these dialogues posed an interesting challenge. It would be difficult to simply gather in one open location and record a group conversation. Instead, the prompts were written out and passed between members of the group, who wrote their response on their own before giving the sheet of paper on to the next man. At the end of the process, the reflections were gathered and edited together. This writing itself therefore constitutes a kind of performative crossing of boundaries. By employing the communal perspective of performance, the members of PPTG create both physical and discursive space for imagining and shaping the horizons of (un)freedom.

In addition, these dialogues are punctuated with video clips and individually authored creative interludes reprinted here from past PPTG performances. We organized the writings in this article into sections, which help structure the insights offered by the group into discrete themes that are nevertheless linked: Freedom, Optimism, Opportunity, Hope, and Darkness. In aggregate, these themes offer readers a view from behind prison walls of the horizons of (un)freedom. The potential freedom of the future is held in sight alongside the risk of liberation’s failure to arrive.

In the wake of the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, the protest poem “Civil Disobedience” offers a powerful statement of solidarity with those on the outside organizing against police killing of unarmed black men. The poem “A Tear Gone AWOL” further considers the category of struggle in the context of mass incarceration, abstracting the moment a tear falls to capture a broader picture of self-reliance and strength. The meditative “Words Make Your World” considers language’s reality-shaping capacity, making a powerful argument for speaking the truth. “Looking Good” engages the interlocking issues of addiction and families of incarcerated people, offering a glimpse of how the ghosts of the past haunt the lives of prisoners in the present. In “Window onto Pain,” a memory of a game of chess between father and daughter assumes heartbreaking significance. Memory is also explored in “Not Answered,” a plaintive meditation on the troubled relations between mother and son in the context of life imprisonment—a sentence all-too-common today. In the remorseful “Mirror Reflections,” the speaker examines himself, trying to understand the aspects of his environment and personal history that created the conditions for his choices that led to his conviction and incarceration. Finally, the percussive poetry of “Story of Words” paints a picture of the nanoseconds just before arrest and imprisonment.

We also include two creative pieces written by members of PPTG who no longer reside at the prison in Auburn. Because members of the group have been released or moved to other prisons in New York State, the composition of the group has always been in flux. But the spirit and contributions of past PPTG members persist—a fact this writing reflects. We include here cofounder Michael Rhynes’s satirical monologue “Zoo,” which posits (with no small amount of irony) that modern zoos model themselves on the racist structure of the prison. The memory piece “Fourth of July Fireworks” by Efraim Diaz demonstrates how recollecting hopeful moments from the past—in this case the birth of a child—can sustain the prisoner in the present. Additionally, two non-incarcerated volunteers participated in writing the introduction and conclusion, and in editing the other sections: Nick Fesette and Bruce Levitt.

In different ways, these writings show that the members of PPTG participate in a praxis of critical hope. They are engaged in a contradictory dialogue with the future, hoping with utopian verve while at the same time reflecting critically on the realities of their past and present. As Balfour argues, theatre is especially suited to explore the contradictions of socially engaged practice that is, on the one hand, resistant to the violence of the prison, and yet, on the other hand, encased in its overarching rehabilitative and penal structures (Balfour 2004, 2–3). However, in resisting attributing a rehabilitative mission to its practice, PPTG employs critical hope that is both more elusive and more transformative—in regards to both the individual and the community. In the short conclusion to this article, we expand on some of the themes and insights explored throughout, as well as connect this practice to larger struggles against mass incarceration. Inasmuch as it is approached as a transformative praxis of critical hope, rather than as a rehabilitative program, it is our belief that prison theatre—like prison art in general—can constitute the type of “non-reformist reform” called for by prison abolitionists Dan Berger, Mariam Kaba, and David Stein (Stein 2017).

As a group, the authors reflect on the negotiation of the potentialities of the future. This negotiation is both innervating and enervating, vivifying and vexing. By foregrounding the necessarily unresolved nature of this conversation in the mode of drama, PPTG sparks further dialogue on the social, structural, historical, embodied, personal, and affective issues of the futurity of incarcerated people.

 

Notes

1 Neoliberal politics can be understood as a general regime of extreme austerity: the simultaneous shrinking of the Keynesian welfare state and the decentralization and privatization of public goods and services. Paradoxically, what has occurred as the state has on the surface attempted to dramatically cut its spending, is that an astonishing amount of government resources have been funneled into the military, police, and prison. See Gottschalk 2015. For more on the struggle of critical hope within this ideology, particularly in the context of UK higher education, see Sutton 2015.

 

Works Cited

AtlanticLIVE. 2015. “The Case for Diversion / Race and Justice in America.” YouTube video, 17:08, November 12. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk97bWAjdgw.

Balfour, Michael, ed. 2004. Theatre in Prison: Theory and Practice. Bristol, UK: Intellect Books.

Barnard Center for Research on Women. 2014. “Reina Gossett + Dean Spade (Part 1): Prison Abolition + Prefiguring the World You Want to Live In.” YouTube video, 3:35, January 7, 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDQlW1uJ8uQ.

Boal, Augusto. 1993. Theatre of the Oppressed. Translated by Charles A. McBride and Maria-Odilia Leal McBride. New York: Theatre Communications Group.

. 1995. Rainbow of Desire: The Boal Method of Theatre and Therapy. Translated by Adrian Jackson. New York: Routledge.

Davis, Angela Y. 2003. Are Prisons Obsolete? New York: Seven Stories Press.

Dolan, Jill. 2005. Utopia in Performance: Finding Hope at the Theater. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Translated by Myra Bergman Ramos. New York: Continuum.

. 1998. Pedagogy of Freedom: Ethics, Democracy, and Civic Courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Gottschalk, Marie. 2015. Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kershaw, Baz. 2004. “Pathologies of Hope in Drama and Theatre.” In Theatre in Prison, edited by Michael Balfour, 101–143.

Larson, Doran. 2013. “Introduction: The American Prison Writer as Witness.” In Fourth City: Essays from the Prison in America, edited by Doran Larson, 1–10. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.

Rhynes, Michael. 2014. “Answering for PPTG.” Personal letter.

Stein, David. 2017. “What Abolitionists Do.” Jacobin, August 24. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/08/prison-abolition-reform-mass-incarceration.

Sutton, Paul. 2015. “A Paradoxical Academic Identity: Fate, Utopia and Critical Hope.” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (1): 37–47.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons License